Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Ariz. 33 - Bohmfalk v. Vaughan

Bohmfalk v. Vaughan’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Gaston v. Hunter (1978), Milam v. Milam (1966)

3 federal appellate · 80 state decisions

410196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pioneer Constructors v. Symes · Carrillo v. Taylor · Hightower v. State of Arizona · In Re Brandt's Estate · Lane v. Mathews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Under such circumstances the evidence will be taken in the strongest manner in favor of the plaintiff and in support of the court's findings, and the judgment will not be disturbed when there is any reasonable evidence to support it.' (Citations) Bohmfalk v. Vaughan (1960), 89 Ariz. 33, 357 P.2d 617.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““However, in this case the plaintiff was only required to plead his affirmative defense of fraud if a reply was absolutely necessary under the rules of procedure as it is not incumbent upon the party filing a complaint to anticipate an affirmative defense which the answer may disclose.- Therefore if it was not mandatory under the rules that the plaintiff file a reply, it can hardly be said that any affirmative defense was waived by a failure to enter a reply.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.