Cherry v. Brizzolara’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently January 1984 · most notably Parker v. Carter (1909), Coumas v. Transcontinental Garage, Inc. (1951)
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lampman v. . Milks · McGuigan v. Gaines · Paine v. . Chandler · Goerke v. Rodgers · Burns v. Gallagher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f he did not do this and sold the property by metes and bounds,... he has no cause for complaint of which the courts can take notice .... [W]hen the means of information are open to both parties alike, so that by ordinary diligence and prudence each may be informed of the facts and rely upon his own judgment in regard to... the subject-matter of the contract, if either fails to avail himself of this opportunity, he will not be heard to say he has been deceived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dobbins v. Hayden“where there is a grant of land with full covenants of warranty and without express reservation of easement, there can be no reservation by implication unless the easement is strictly one of absolute necessity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.