Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Ark. App. 146 - Winters v. State

89 Ark. App. 146 - Winters v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Franks v. Delaware · State Oil Co. v. Khan · Fulbright v. United States · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was in that interview that M.P. disclosed having been touched inappropriately and that Johnson had slid his cell phone under a closed door with the video application running while she and her sister were changing clothes. These are all facts that bear on the various informants' reliability and disclose how the information was obtained. Further, failure to establish the bases of knowledge of the informant is not a fatal defect if the affidavit viewed as a whole”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “provides a substantial basis for a finding of reasonable cause to believe that things subject to seizure will be found in a particular place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.