Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 CAL 327 - Harrison v. McCormick

Harrison v. McCormick’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
10
states following
February 1974
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently February 1974 · most notably Masterson v. Sine (1968), Harding v. Robinson (1917)

4 federal appellate · 65 state decisions — followed in 10 states

140189119001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Naumberg v. Young · Thompson v. Libby · Wiener v. Whipple

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If it imports on its face to be a complete expression of the whole agreement—that is, contains such language as imports a complete legal obligation—it is to be presumed that the parties have introduced into it every material item and term; and parol evidence cannot be admitted to add another term to the agreement, although the writing contains nothing on the particular one to which the parol evidence is directed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““San Francisco, January 12, 1882. “Messrs. McCormick & Lewis. “Ordered from J. W. Harrison fifty tons Montana Lode Lump Lehigh Hand picked Coal, early lading in New York. Ship to be named, original cost, etc. To be paid on receipt of bills of lading, etc., and the freight to be paid on receipt of coal here, at $13.50 per ton per 2,240 pounds, gold coin, payable as above, delivered from ship’s side when landed. Any shortage in excess of two per cent to be paid by the seller.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““When parties have deliberately put their engagement in writing in such terms as import a legal obligation, without any uncertainty as to the object or extent of such engagement, it is conclusively presumed that the whole engagement of the parties and the extent and manner of their undertaking was reduced to writing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.