89 Cal. App. 4th 1312 - In Re Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2020
4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 23 Cal. 4th 754 - Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc. · Williams v. Superior Court · In Re Hillery · 188 Cal. App. 3d 737 - Ford v. Superior Court · 21 Cal. App. 3d 67 - In Re Kowalski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 10 of article VI of the California Constitution . . . provides in pertinent part: `The Supreme Court, courts of appeal, superior courts, and their judges have original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings.' This provision grants original subject matter jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedings concurrently to the superior court, the Court of Appeal, and [the Supreme Court].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“has discretion to refuse to issue the writ ... on the ground that application has not [first] been made ... in a lower court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.