89 Cal. App. 4th 946 - In Re Walter S.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Marchetti v. United States · 8 Cal. 3d 410 - In Re Lynch · Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board · People Ex Rel. Gallo v. Acuna
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) Any person described in subdivision (b) shall register with the chief of police of the city in which he or she resides, or the sheriff of the county if he or she resides in an unincorporated area, within 10 days of release from custody or within 10 days of his or her arrival in any city, county, or city and county to reside there, whichever occurs first. “(b) Subdivision (a) shall apply to any person convicted in a criminal court or who has had a petition sustained in a juvenile court in this state for any of the following offenses: “(1) Subdivision (a) of Section 186.22. “(2) Any crime where the enhancement specified in subdivision (b) of Section 186.22 is found to be true. “(3) Any crime that the court finds is gang related at the time of sentencing or disposition.” (§ 186.30.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.