89 Conn. App. 260 - Boccanfuso v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
72 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Smith v. Muellner (2007), 93 Conn. App. 759 - Rudder v. MAMANASCO LAKE PARK ASS'N, INC. (2006)
72 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Emigrant Savings Bank v. Cam · In Re As · O'Neil v. Interstate Navigation Co. · Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell · Commonwealth v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his court's policy dictates that one panel should not ... reverse the ruling of a previous panel. The reversal may be accomplished only if the appeal is heard en banc.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Adverse uses meeting the requirements [for creating easements by prescription] that unreasonably interfere with easements or violate covenants, if continued throughout the prescriptive period, extinguish the benefit of the servitude to the extent of the adverse use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matoush v. Lovingood“separate and distinct method[ ] by which an easement may be extinguished.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matoush v. Lovingood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.