Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 F.2d 1009

Docket No. 7579.

Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1937.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1937-04-09

2 counsel of record

Relies on Hiller v. Olmstead · Hyman v. Meifert

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1937-04-09

¶1Welsh, Bebout & Hill, of Detroit, Mich., and William J. Beer, of Royal Oak, Mich., for appellant.

¶2Stanley E. Hathaway, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

¶3Before HICKS, MACK, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5It appearing that the record presents no reviewable question because (1) it contains no finding of fact, and (2) it does not appear that the facts stated in the certificate of the referee were accepted by the District Judge, rule 34, clause 2 (b) of this court; Hiller v. Olmstead, 54 F.(2d) 5, 7 (C.C.A.6) ; In re Meifert, 57 F.(2d) 861 (C.C.A.6), it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, dismissed.

/89/f2d/1009 · .json · Public domain