Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.2d 35 - Singer Mfg. Co. v. Seinfeld

Singer Mfg. Co. v. Seinfeld’s Empirical Analysis

89 F.2d 35 · 1937

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
July 1969
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1969

7 federal appellate ·

401937194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Swift & Co. · Charles Green Co. v. Henry P. Adams Co. · Armstrong v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. · United States v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff either to renew the application or to proceed by way of a new suit as it may be advised.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to make more clear and specific what had already been enjoined”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.