Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.2d 353 - Pieczonka v. Pullman Co.

Pieczonka v. Pullman Co.’s Empirical Analysis

89 F.2d 353 · 1937

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2011

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

50193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co. · Flynn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad · Plazak v. Allegheny Steel Company · McCahill v. New York Transportation Co. · Kelliher v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a quite separate question from whether the suit must be brought within three years from the last breathing of the dust.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.