Taylor v. McManigal’s Empirical Analysis
89 F.2d 583 · 1937
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 1989
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 920
Relies on Crowell v. Benson · A. O. Smith Corp. v. Petroleum Iron Works Co. · De Wald v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. · The Bound Brook · Seneca Washed Gravel Corp. v. McManigal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The crew is usually referred to and is naturally and primarily thought of as those who are on board and aiding in the navigation without reference to the nature of the arrangement under which they are on board, (citation omitted) “The commonly accepted meaning of the word ‘crew’ is the whole company which mans a ship and aids in the navigation, or the ‘ship’s company.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The most that may be said is that he [appellant], with the other men working on the boat, expected to become members of the crew when it was organized and when the vessel was ready to sail.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.