Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.3d 1009 - Homar v. Gilbert

Homar v. Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis

89 F.3d 1009 · 1996

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2017 · most notably Gilbert v. Homar (1997), Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State University (2000)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

160199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Singleton v. Wulff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of property interest worthy of substantive due process protection. We have also strongly suggested in dictum that a student's right to continued enrollment in a graduate program does not rise to such a level on the ground that such an interest bears”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[executive acts, such as employment decisions, typically apply to one person or to a limited number of persons, while legislative acts, generally laws and broad executive regulations, apply to large segments of society.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “improperly interfered with the process by which the municipality issued building permits, and that they did so for partisan political or personal reasons unrelated to the merits of the application for the permits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.