Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.3d 1123 - Rankin

Rankin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2019

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

70199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Rake v. Wade · Sisson v. Ruby · Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Whitman · Lincoln Savings Bank, FSB v. Suffolk County Treasurer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the court shall confirm a plan if— (1) the plan complies with the provisions of this chapter and with the other applicable provisions of this title; (2) any fee ... has been paid; (3) the plan has been proposed in good faith ...; (4) the value, as of the effective date of the plan, of property to be distributed under the plan on account of each allowed unsecured claim is not less than the amount that would be paid on such claim if the estate of the debtor were liquidated under chapter 7 of this title on such date; (5) with respect to each allowed secured claim provided for by the plan— (A) the holder of such claim has accepted the plan; (B)(i) the plan provides that the holder of such claim retain the lien securing such claim; and (ii) the value, as of the effective date of the plan, of property to he distributed under the plan on account of such claim is not less than the allowed amount of such claim; or (C) the debtor surrenders the property securing such claim to such holder; and (6) the debtor will be able to make all payments under the plan and to comply with the plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whenever a general provision in a statute shall be in conflict with a special provision in the same or another statute, the two shall be construed, if possible, so that effect may be given to both. If the conflict between the two provisions is irreconcilable, the special provisions shall prevail and shall be construed as an exception to the general provision, unless the general provision shall be enacted later and it shall be the manifest intention of the General Assembly that such general provisions shall prevail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor's principal residence.” While the parties agree that the property at issue is the Debtors' residence, the quoted language does not apply here because Will County’s tax lien is not a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.