Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.3d 1491 - Biddulph v. Mortham

Biddulph v. Mortham’s Empirical Analysis

89 F.3d 1491 · 1996

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Victoria Buckley, Secretary of State of Colorado, v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc. (1999), Long v. Shorebank Development Corp. (1999)

22 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

1701996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973A (§ 3 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. · California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited · Williams v. Rhodes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n the initiative process people do not seek to make wishes known to government representatives but instead to enact change by bypassing their representatives altogether.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he right to place a citizen initiative proposal on the ballot is a state-created right (and thus, by implication, not a right guaranteed by the First Amendment).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Clearly, the right to a state initiative process is not a right guaranteed by the United States Constitution, but is a right created by state law”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.