King v. Erickson’s Empirical Analysis
89 F.3d 1575 · 1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Kastigar v. United States · United States v. Dunnigan · Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“remark made, or opinion expressed, by a judge, in his decision upon a cause, 'by the way,' that is, incidentally or collaterally, and not directly upon the question before him, or upon a point not necessarily involved in the determination of the cause, or introduced by way of illustration, or analogy or argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. Erickson“calls and that encouraging another to engage in such a prank was disruptive to the agency's mission. Further, based on the AJ's belief in the credibility of the statements in the affidavit, as well as affidavits of others, the AJ found that Erickson had knowledge of and participated in the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. Erickson“calls were calls to employees at their duty stations during which the caller would laugh continuously and then hang up without identifying himself or herself. 7 The falsification charge was based on Erickson's denials that he participated in the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. Erickson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.