Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.3d 265 - Miller v. Butcher Distributors

Miller v. Butcher Distributors’s Empirical Analysis

89 F.3d 265 · 1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 2013
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2013

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Morley Const Co v. Maryland Casualty Co · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Louisiana Office of Community Services · Barrow v. New Orleans Steamship Ass'n · Robicheaux v. Radcliff Material, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Defendant] for the first time now argues, somewhat inanely, that Miller was not actually terminated from employment. Instead, the defendant contends that Miller was offered a part-time position which she refused. Thus, [defendant] asserts that Miller voluntarily resigned_ The evidence presented at trial allowed the jury to conclude that Miller was terminated....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.