Barnard v. Henman’s Empirical Analysis
89 F.3d 373 · 1996
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2012
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Granito v. United States · Gumport v. Sterling Press, Inc. · Evans v. United States Parole Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no dispute that the Commission can issue a warrant and place it as a detainer against the prisoner, waiting to execute it until the prisoner has completed service of his sentence for the crime that he committed on parole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Parole Commission alone has the power to choose whether to order that a parole violator warrant be executed or be filed as a detainer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.