Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.3d 554 - Mount Graham Coalition v. Thomas

Mount Graham Coalition v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

89 F.3d 554 · 1996

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
October 2020
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2020

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

801996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Swift & Co. · Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. · System Federation No. 91 v. Wright · George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. Rose · United States v. Klein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan, 954 F.2d 1441 (9th Cir.1992) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “); Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Espy, 986 F.2d 1568 (9th Cir.1993) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “); Mount Graham Coalition v. Thomas, 53 F.3d 970 (9th Cir.1995) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.