Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.3d 559 - in Re Transcon Lines

in Re Transcon Lines’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
January 2013
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2013

7 federal appellate · 4 district ·

110199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council · Sloan v. Hicks · Hughey v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) relied on factors which Congress has not intended it to consider; 2) entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem; 3) offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency; or 4) is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product of agency expertise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Unlike common carriage, which involves services held out indiscriminately to all shippers, contract carriage is limited to shippers with which carriers enter into specific agreements or contracts” defined by the ICA”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.