Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.3d 710 - United States v. Belt

United States v. Belt’s Empirical Analysis

89 F.3d 710 · 1996

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States v. Fortier (1999), United States v. Bunner (1998)

37 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Koon v. United States · Yakus v. United States · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[U]nless the judge's language unambiguously states that the judge does not believe he has authority to downward depart, we will not review his decision.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Njotwithstanding any other provision of law, the court shall not suspend the sentence of, or grant a probationary sentence to, such person with respect to the conviction under section 922(g).”) with, e.g., 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(A) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[ajbsent the trial court’s clear misunderstanding of its discretion to depart, or its imposition of a sentence which violates the law or incorrectly applies the guidelines, we have no jurisdiction to review a refusal to depart.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.