Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 F.3d 828

Docket No. 96-6354.

Head v. State L W

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted June 20, 1996. Decided June 25, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-06-25

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Haynes v. State T

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-06-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2016

3 district ·

30199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Joseph Marion Head, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Head v. North Carolina, No. CA-96-47-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/89/f3d/828 · .json · Public domain