89 F3d 829 Rogers v. S Carr

89 F.3d 829

Nevell ROGERS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Robert S. CARR, United States Magistrate Judge, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 96-6117.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 28, 1996.

Decided June 6, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-3829-3-OBC)

Nevell Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Advertisement
view counter
1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rogers v. Carr, No. CA-95-3829-3-OBC (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.