Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.3d 87 - Imbrogno v. Chamberlin

Imbrogno v. Chamberlin’s Empirical Analysis

89 F.3d 87 · 1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2023

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

1001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Salve Regina College v. Russell · Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. · Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc. · Peck v. Jacquemin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An agreement with any tortfeasor not to bring legal action or a release of a tort-feasor in any cause of action shall not be read to a jury or in any other way introduced in evidence by either party at any time during the trial of the cause of action against any other joint tortfea-sors, nor shall any other agreement not to sue or release of claim among any plaintiffs or defendants in the action be read or in any other way introduced to a jury. If the court at the conclusion of the trial concludes that the verdict is excessive as a matter of law, it shall order a remittitur and, upon failure of the party so ordered to remit the amount ordered by the court, it shall set aside the verdict and order a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.