Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.4th 173 - United States v. Walker

United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2023

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act)

Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Ruiz · United States v. Graciani · United States v. Cintrón-Echautegui · United States v. Carpenter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The lack of any explanation for the district court's decision gives us special pause here because it is not apparent from the record that the court performed the inquiry required by the . . . [g]uideline.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “We review the district court's interpretation and application of the Guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.