Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F.4th 203 - Ward v. Schaefer

Ward v. Schaefer’s Empirical Analysis

2023

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2679

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Milliken v. Meyer · United States v. Zannino · Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e draw the relevant facts from 'the pleadings and whatever supplemental filings (such as affidavits) are contained in the record, giving credence to the plaintiff's version of genuinely contested facts.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e are not bound by the district court's reasoning . . . [and] are free to uphold the judgment on any ground supported by the record,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that, if credited, would support all findings 'essential to personal jurisdiction.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.