Dupree v. Brown

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-03-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2007

1 district ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion · Decided 2004-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Juan Jose Dupree appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Dupree v. Brown, No. CA-02-3515RDB (D. Md. June 30, 2003). We conclude that Dupree’s claim that prison conditions violate the Eighth Amendment is meritless. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED