¶1 Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), and denying his post-judgment motion to amend his complaint and reinstate his action. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we grant the Appellee’s motion to dismiss, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Spangler, 2004 WL 524890, No. CA-03-569-7 (W.D.Va. filed Aug. 29, 2003; entered Sept. 2, 2003 & Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 DISMISSED