Snyder v. Addison’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · United States v. Cronic · Bell Warden v. Cone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[defense counsel cross-examined the State’s guilt-stage witnesses, made objections to the State’s evidence, presented some evidence in Petitioner’s defense, and made opening and closing arguments”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turrentine v. Mullin“[counsel] was present in the courtroom[,] ... conducted limited cross-examination, made evidentiary objections, and gave a closing argument”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turrentine v. Mullin“counsel actively participated in all phases of the trial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turrentine v. Mullin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.