89 F. Supp. 504 - Fitzgerald v. Abramson’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 1988
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2283 · 29 U.S.C. § 101 (Norris-LaGuardia Act)
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. Cauble · American Steel Foundries v. Robertson · G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Saalfield · Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“disabled from operating as a functioning organization as a result of the acts of the defendants”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Kay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.