Slavik v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1994
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath · United States ex rel. Trinler v. Carusi · United States ex rel. Trinler v. Carusi · Connor v. Miller · Podovinnikoff v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The petitioner unquestionably is in the technical custody of the immigration authorities since a detainer has been lodged for the body of the petitioner at the time that the fulfillment of the state sentence has expired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roldan v. Racette
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.