United States v. Fortier’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1954
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 1 U.S.C. § 109 · 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Relies on United States v. Carter · Pruitt v. Litman · 90 F. Supp. 395 - United States v. Tyler Corp. · Katz v. Litman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here clearly the facts necessary to constitute a violation occurred after repeal. No proviso is contained in the Act of 1947 to maintain ceilings on the sale price of dwellings, and the failure to so provide might well have been that Congress deemed the situation did not require further supervision. Whatever powers were vested in Priorities Regulation 33 of the Second War Powers Act, under which it was promulgated and later adopted and continued in effect under the Veterans' Emergency Housing Act, would appear to have been abrogated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“That any allocations made or committed, or priorities granted for the delivery, of any housing materials or facilities under any regulation or order issued under the authority contained in said Act, and before the date of enactment of this Act (June 30, 1947), * * * shall remain in full force and effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Sections 1, 2 (b) through 9, and sections 11 and 12, of Public Law 388, Seventy-ninth Congress (sections 1821, 1822 (b-d), 1823-1829, 1831, and 1832 of this Appendix), are hereby repealed * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.