Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 FSUPP 72 - Otto v. Hirl

Otto v. Hirl’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1974
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1974

2 district ·

60195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 45 U.S.C. § 51 (Federal Employers' Liability Act)

Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Collett Kitpatrick v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co · Goldenberg v. Murphy · Isaacks v. Jeffers · Armstrong Cork Co. v. Merchants' Refrigerating Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Change of venue: (a) For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” (Italics supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Subsection (a) was drafted in accordance with the doctrine of forum non conveniens, permitting transfer to a more convenient forum, even though ■the' venue is proper. * * * The new subsection requires the court to determine that the transfer is necessary for convenience of the parties and witnesses, and further, that it is . in the interest of justice to do’ so.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.