Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 F. Supp. 2d 564 - Miller v. McMann

89 F. Supp. 2d 564 - Miller v. McMann’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is elementary that each partner is the agent of the other and of the partnership. This common law principle was adopted by the uniform partnership act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.