Roman v. Korson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1484 · 5 U.S.C. § 703
Relies on Heckler v. Chaney · United States v. Swift & Co. · Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell · Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All agricultural workers in the United States who reside, have resided or will reside in FmHA § 514 housing projects operating without loan agreements who have been or will be charged unauthorized rent and/or utilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roman v. Korson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.