Barna v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1402 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Relies on Richards v. United States · United States v. Gaubert · 114 Ill. 2d 107 - Ballweg v. City of Springfield · 176 Ill. 2d 1 - Advincula v. United Blood Services · United States v. Sblendorio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a clear indication that what he had just heard was not a solution to his problem, but rather was further confirmation that no solution could be provided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.