Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Ill. 2d 247 - In Re Grant

89 Ill. 2d 247 - In Re Grant’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2011

23 state decisions

1501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 60 Ill. 2d 590 - In Re Sherman · 78 Ill. 2d 276 - In Re Clayter · 85 Ill. 2d 318 - In Re Hopper · 64 Ill. 2d 419 - In Re Andros · 85 Ill. 2d 312 - In Re Driscoll

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “explanations [for conversion] such as `poor bookkeeping,' `failure to fully understand the duty' and `no dishonest motive' completely unacceptable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.