89 Ind. App. 52 - Doench v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1957
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Hess · Atkinson v. State · Peters v. Koepke · Johns v. State · Capps v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The only question for decision relates to the action of the court in refusing appellant leave to withdraw his plea of guilty entered in the city court. It is the law in this jurisdcition that where there has been a plea before a justice of the peace in a prosecution for a misdemeanor, no further plea is required in the circuit court on appeal. Johns v. State (1886), 104 Ind. 557 , 4 N. E. 153 ; Eisenman v. State (1875), 49 Ind. 520 ; Cline v. State (1900), 25 Ind. App. 331 , 58 N. E. 210 . . . . such plea cannot be withdrawn without leave of court. Peters v. Koepke (1901), 156 Ind. 35 , 59 N. E. 33 . Ordinarily, the granting of leave to withdraw a plea of guilty is within the sound discretion of the trial court. Where it appears that the trial court has abused its discretion in denying an application to withdraw a plea of guilty, the court of appeal will review the ruling, but when it appears that the ruling on such an application is based on conflicting evidence, the appellate tribunal will not disturb the conclusion reached by the trial court. Atkinson v. State (1920), 190 Ind. 1 , 128 N. E. 433 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.