Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 KAN 352 - Weisner v. Weisner

Weisner v. Weisner’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 1952
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1952

11 state decisions

4019131920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Keeler v. Lauer · Reville v. Dubach · Sill v. Sill · Jack v. Hooker · Buchanan v. Gibbs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nevertheless it cannot be thought the legislature intended that a wife, under the stress of expected widowhood and actuated by a desire to please her husband . . . should be held bound by such consent when it fairly appears that she did not understand its effect upon her property rights.” (p. 356.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.