¶1The order of the district court granting a new trial is affirmed in accordance with the well-settled rule. (Murray v. Railway Co., 87 Kan. 750, 125 Pac. 45; Putnam v. King, 87 Kan. 842, 126 Pac. 1093; Bourquin v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 183, 127 Pac. 770; and cases cited in these opinions.)
89 Kan. 445
Farquharson v. Lightner
Decided April 12, 1913
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1913-04-12
<p>Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1.</p>
Relies on Bourquin v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. · Murray v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. · Putnam Investment Co. v. King
Affirmed · Decided 1913-04-12