Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Md. App. 144 - Freese v. Freese

89 Md. App. 144 - Freese v. Freese’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2010

16 state decisions

80199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Deering v. Deering · 58 Md. App. 308 - Holston v. Holston · Grant v. Zich · Brodak v. Brodak · 77 Md. App. 750 - Wassif v. Wassif

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the contribution, monetary and nonmonetary, of each party to the well-being of the family; (2) the value of all property interests of each party; (3) the economic circumstances of each party at the time the award is made; (4) the circumstances that contributed to the estrangement of the parties; (5) the duration of the marriage; (6) the age of each party; (7) the physical and mental condition of each party; (8) how and when specific marital property was acquired, including the effort expended by each party in accumulating the marital property; (9) any award of alimony and any award of other provision that the court has made with respect to family use of personal property or the family home; and (10) any other factor that the court considers necessary or appropriate to consider in order to arrive at a fair and equitable monetary award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.