State v. Huffman’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably State v. LaMere (2000), Jones v. State (1998)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Rickert · Calumet Grain Elevator Company v. City of Chicago · State v. Rechnitz · State v. Rodriguez · State v. Pippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The right to challenge is the right to reject, not to select, a juror; no person can acquire a vested right to have any particular member of a panel sit upon his case unless and until such member has been accepted and sworn. Prejudice is not presumed from error, and we are commanded by section 12125, Revised Codes 1921, [ now R.C.M.1947, § 94-8207] to ‘give judgment without regard to technical errors * * * which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties.’ This has been the rule in this jurisdiction since territorial days. [Citing cases.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Moran
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.