Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 NC 574 - State v. . Brittain

State v. . Brittain’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1995

8 state decisions

30188318901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The proof was that the defendant sold liquors, and it must be taken that he sold spirituous liquors. Most generally the term liquors implies spirituous liquors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.