89 N.J. Super. 85 - State v. Angleton’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on New Jersey Highway Authority v. Ellis · 63 N.J. Super. 326 - State, by State Highway Commissioner v. Hankins · Acquackanonk Water Co. v. Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co. · Blaicher Holding Co. v. City of Newark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The thesis upon which plaintiff's [State's] argument is predicated is that when an appeal is taken in this type of proceeding the claims of the respective parties are litigated de novo and the prior proceedings before the commissioners, and the result thereof, are superseded and become of no effect. Thus, argues plaintiff, the rights and obligations of the respective parties are measured by the ultimate disposition of the court proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.