Childers v. Childers’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1976
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sitta v. Zinn · Buresh v. City of Las Cruces · Jones v. Seaton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No suit shall be prosecuted or begun in any district court to review, in any manner inquire into, reopen or set aside any order, judgment or decree of the probate court in matters of its exclusive original jurisdiction and no order, judgment or decree of the probate court in matters of its exclusive original jurisdiction shall be reviewed or examined in any district court except upon an appeal taken in the manner provided by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rutherford v. Buhler“"No act of the legislature shall affect the right or remedy of either party, or change the rules of evidence or procedure, in any pending case. N.M.Constitution, Art. IV, § 34."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rutherford v. Buhler“The probate courts have exclusive original jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rutherford v. Buhler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.