Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 NM 516 - Wells v. Arch Hurley Conservancy District

Wells v. Arch Hurley Conservancy District’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2022

6 state decisions

20197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Merlo v. Public Service Co. · Transwestern Pipe Line Company v. Yandell · Schechtman v. Foster · Hambaugh v. Peoples · Zamora v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rules of pleading cannot be totally disregarded if there is to be an orderly disposition of cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.