State v. Najera’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 2001 · most notably Santillanes v. State (1993), State v. Segotta (1983)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Minns · Floyd Woodrow Hines v. J. E. Baker, Warden · State v. Aguirre · State v. Orzen · State v. Marchiondo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A statute violates due process if it is so vague that persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning. ‘The vagueness doctrine is based on notice and applies when a potential actor is exposed to criminal sanctions without a fair warning as to the nature of the proscribed activity.’ State v. Marchiondo, 85 N.M. 627 , 515 P.2d 146 (Ct.App.1973).””
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sierra · State v. Turley“Possession of burglary tools consists of having in the person’s possession a device or instrumentality designed or commonly used for the commission of burglary and under circumstances evincing an intent to use the same in the commission of burglary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jennings
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.