Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Ohio App. 3d 230 - Clipson v. Schlessman

89 Ohio App. 3d 230 - Clipson v. Schlessman’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2013

14 state decisions

90199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. · Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc. · 19 Ohio St. 3d 100 - Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co. · Helmick v. Cincinnati Word Processing, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to discharge an employee without just cause because of a handicap. R.C. 4112.02(A). This statement of public policy has been effective since July 1976. Am.Sub.S.B. No. 162, 136 Ohio Laws, Part I, 424, 432, effective 7-23-76. Since appellant alleges that he was discharged for a reason prohibited by statute, public policy warrants an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine and appellant may bring a cause of action for wrongful discharge.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “1. Public policy warrants an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine when an employee is discharged or disciplined for a reason which is prohibited by statute. (R.C. 3113.213[D], construed and applied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.