89 Ohio App. 3d 550 - Madorsky v. Bernstein’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. · 55 Ohio App. 2d 51 - Juhasz v. Quik Shops, Inc. · Fox & Assocs. Co. v. Purdon · 23 Ohio App. 3d 146 - Smith v. Klein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonable minds could construe [the defendant's] forcing [his client] to make a choice between [the parties] as interfering with [the client's] attorney-client relationship with [the plaintiff],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“had a privilege to disclose to his client that he could no longer work with [the plaintiff]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.