Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Ohio App. 3d 614 - State v. Box

89 Ohio App. 3d 614 - State v. Box’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Eley · State v. Deem · State v. Kidder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “R.C. 2903.11(A)(1) satisfies the three requirements set forth in State v. Deem, 40 Ohio St.3d 205 (1988). Felonious assault under R.C. 2903.11(A)(1) is a crime of lesser degree which carried a lesser penalty than aggravated murder. The offense of aggravated murder under R.C. 2903.01(A) cannot be committed without the offense of felonious assault also being committed because proof of purpose is also proof of knowledge pursuant to R.C. 2901.22(E). Further, aggravated murder under R.C. 2903.01(A) requires proof that the defendant with prior calculation and design caused the death of another, which is not required to prove the commission of the lesser offense of felonious assault.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the core offense of murder requires purposely causing the death of another. R.C. 2903.02(A). One type of felonious assault involves knowingly causing serious physical harm to another. R.C. 2903.11(A)(1). Clearly, the offense of murder necessarily includes the commission of felonious assault through causing serious physical harm, because purposely causing death necessarily involves knowingly causing serious physical harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.