Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 Ohio App. 3d 69 - State v. Dietz

89 Ohio App. 3d 69 - State v. Dietz’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Mothers Against Drunk Drivers v. Gosser · Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co. · 74 Ohio App. 3d 764 - State Ex Rel. Hadlock v. Polito

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘(B)(1) If a presentence investigation report is prepared pursuant to this section, * * *, the court, at a reasonable time before imposing sentence, shall permit the defendant or his counsel to read the report * * *: « t s-j ‡ :|i “ ‘(6) Any copies of the presentence investigation report that are made available pursuant to this section to the defendant or his counsel or to the prosecutor shall be returned to the court, probation officer, or investigator immediately after the imposition of sentence or the granting of probation, unless the court * * * directs otherwise.’ (Emphasis added.)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.